Kommentare für Service and Integration Technology http://www.integration-engineering.de Blog der Forschungsgruppe Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:41:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 Kommentar zu From Microsoft Visio to MetaEdit+ via Eclipse EMF von From MetaEdit+ to Microsoft Visio via Eclispe EMF « Service and Integration Technology http://www.integration-engineering.de/2010/03/from-microsoft-visio-to-metaedit-via-eclipse-emf/comment-page-1#comment-62 From MetaEdit+ to Microsoft Visio via Eclispe EMF « Service and Integration Technology Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:41:00 +0000 http://www.integration-engineering.de/?p=910#comment-62 [...] article is the counterpart of the article “From Microsoft Visio to MetaEdit+ via Eclipse EMF” and should show the export of MetaEdit+ models into Microsoft Visio. Our solution components [...] [...] article is the counterpart of the article “From Microsoft Visio to MetaEdit+ via Eclipse EMF” and should show the export of MetaEdit+ models into Microsoft Visio. Our solution components [...]

]]> Kommentar zu Team von bflow* Toolbox 1.0.0 « EBIE http://www.integration-engineering.de/team/comment-page-1#comment-57 bflow* Toolbox 1.0.0 « EBIE Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:28:00 +0000 http://blog.integration-engineering.de/?page_id=236#comment-57 [...] we want to give thanks to our students, who support us with the development of bflow*. Thanks to Jörg Hartman, who mainly worked at the oEPC editor, the validation approach, and the UML transformation. Thanks [...] [...] we want to give thanks to our students, who support us with the development of bflow*. Thanks to Jörg Hartman, who mainly worked at the oEPC editor, the validation approach, and the UML transformation. Thanks [...]

]]> Kommentar zu Processing of MetaEdit+ Models with oAW von Heiko Kern http://www.integration-engineering.de/2009/08/processing-of-metaedit-models-with-oaw/comment-page-1#comment-16 Heiko Kern Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:41:00 +0000 http://blog.integration-engineering.de/?p=194#comment-16 Hello Steven, thank you for your nice comment! I agree with you that "versus" sounds a little bit provocative. But I wanted to lay emphasis on the comparison idea between oAW and MERL. That's why, I used "MERL vs. oAW" instead of "MERL and oAW". Anyway, I think, the idea of a comparison between different DSM/MDD tools could be very exciting and helpful. Furthermore, I've read your reply to my article and posted some comments on your blog. http://www.metacase.com/blogs/stevek/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3428923761 Hello Steven, thank you for your nice comment! I agree with you that “versus” sounds a little bit provocative. But I wanted to lay emphasis on the comparison idea between oAW and MERL. That’s why, I used “MERL vs. oAW” instead of “MERL and oAW”. Anyway, I think, the idea of a comparison between different DSM/MDD tools could be very exciting and helpful. Furthermore, I’ve read your reply to my article and posted some comments on your blog.
http://www.metacase.com/blogs/stevek/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3428923761

]]> Kommentar zu Processing of MetaEdit+ Models with oAW von Steven Kelly http://www.integration-engineering.de/2009/08/processing-of-metaedit-models-with-oaw/comment-page-1#comment-13 Steven Kelly Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:31:00 +0000 http://blog.integration-engineering.de/?p=194#comment-13 Hi Heiko, nice post! It's great to see all of your integration work so well presented here. Your idea for an article "MERL vs. oAW" sounds interesting, although maybe just "MERL and oAW" is less combative and indeed truer, since they're actually really similar. I've posted the corresponding (if somewhat shorter!) MERL code for your UML->Java example on my blog: http://www.metacase.com/blogs/stevek/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3428923761 Maybe you want to take me up on my challenge about generator performance too? :-) http://www.metacase.com/blogs/stevek/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3385914921 Hi Heiko, nice post! It’s great to see all of your integration work so well presented here. Your idea for an article “MERL vs. oAW” sounds interesting, although maybe just “MERL and oAW” is less combative and indeed truer, since they’re actually really similar. I’ve posted the corresponding (if somewhat shorter!) MERL code for your UML->Java example on my blog:
http://www.metacase.com/blogs/stevek/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3428923761

Maybe you want to take me up on my challenge about generator performance too? :-)
http://www.metacase.com/blogs/stevek/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3385914921

]]>